top of page

Sometimes a good subjective argument works better than presenting the facts.
Sometimes a good subjective argument works better than presenting the facts.

Organizations are constantly frustrated in the capital projects planning process and developing appropriate Operations and Maintenance (O&M) budgets. Written business cases solve either problem; however, many organizations do not get them done for differing reasons.


The Top 5 reasons provided are not necessarily good reasons, at least in theory, but are the real reasons based on three decades in the business.


5. I get what I want because I am better at advocating than my peers – It is hard to argue with this from an individual perspective. But what about the rest of the organization?


4. We don’t have a standard format – Many organizations have a standard format. The question is usually whether the format has been updated recently and whether current leaders know the process.



3. We do them, just not in writing – It does not count if it is not in writing. Remember, big decisions are rich with complexity and uncertainty. It will take time and layers of management to arrive at a final decision. At a minimum, consistency and communication require the business case to be in writing.


2. There is not enough time – Business cases do take time. On the other hand, how many meetings and how much time is wasted debating a major decision. Spending some time on the front end saves time on the back end.


1. The boss doesn’t seem to care – Sometimes. In many cases, the boss may not know. Quitely do a couple of business cases, submit them up the line, and see what happens. You will be surprised by the success you experience.



Again, these are not necessarily good or bad. The reasons just are. The good news is that existing business case formats are “out there” and can be adapted to your organization. All you need to be willing to do is avoid the status quo (and frustration) of informal capital and O&M decision processes.


 

JD Solomon, Inc. helps develop business cases, provides third-party reviews, supports the development of enterprise-wide business case standards, and provides training workshops.


Johnston County Commissioner approve Phase 1 of Water and Wastewater Regionalization Assessment
Water & Wastewater Regionalization Phase 1 Approved by County Commissioners

On Tuesday, January 18, 2022, the Johnston County Board of Commissioners approved the contract to evaluate long-term water & sewer regionalization options for 11 towns and 2 private utilities. Johnston County selected JD Solomon Inc in the fall of 2021 to lead the regionalization assessment effort. Engineering firm Black & Veatch was selected on Tuesday to evaluate the integrated infrastructure needs and limitations.


Regionalization can take many forms ranging from shared administrative service and emergency interconnections on one end of the spectrum to full mergers and consolidations on the other end. Subsequent phases of the regionalization assessment will include financial, legal, human resources, and environmental aspects for the viable options indicated in the first phase.


Johnston County’s effort is the most comprehensive water and sewer regionalization effort in the Research Triangle region since Wake County performed a similar assessment nearly 25 years ago. Wake County’s effort resulted in over a decade of activities ranging from inter-local partnerships to full utility mergers. The regionalization effort continues to win quiet praise for maintaining the county’s quality of life.


Johnston County, which also operates a water & sewer utility, is performing the regionalization assessment with financial resources from its General Fund and an outside resource (JD Solomon, Inc) to lead the process. Once viable regional options are determined, the separate water & wastewater utilities will be expected to execute projects through their enterprise funds. Grants and loans from the State of North Carolina and the 2021 Federal infrastructure Bill are expected to provide additional project resources to support utility ratepayers.


Johnston County is located in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina. Johnston County has a population of 225,000 and continues to be one of the state's fastest-growing counties. Black & Veatch is a 100-year-old engineering firm based in Kansas City and with offices in Raleigh and Charlotte. JD Solomon Inc has offices in North and South Carolina that provide program development, asset management, and facilitation services in eight states.

 




Facilitator asking powerful questions
Use introductory and clarifying questions to make your facilitation effective.

I knew it was going to be a long week when my co-facilitator asked the group, “So, what happens when a submersible pump fails.” Their eyes spoke louder than the deafening silence. The skinny guy on the front row responded, “Don’t YOU know?” “You are an idiot!” exclaimed the old guy on the left side with a deep stare. The slightly heavy woman in the middle, who looked like everyone’s big sister, retorted, "why don't you just tell us.” The fat guy in the back looked around, cut his eyes back at me, and said, “Where are the doughnuts?”


Yup, it was going to be a long week. Facilitating Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is never fun. Tag teaming the facilitation usually helps everyone stay fresh. But as Forrest Gump said about the box of chocolates, when you co-facilitate in a Fortune 500 company you never know what you are going to get.


Powerful questions are enablers of better facilitation. Using powerful questions takes awareness, discipline, practice, and self-appraisal. Facilitators need powerful questions to get better participant answers and create better results.


Powerful Questions Defined

Powerful questions lead participants to active thought, debate, and compelling results. Weak questions do the opposite – as my FMEA facilitation friend proved. Introductory questions and clarifying questions are the two major classes of powerful questions.


Introductory Questions

An example of a weak introductory question is, “What are the problems with the current procurement process?” If there is one positive aspect, it is that the question is open-ended. However, the question does nothing to stimulate the imagination or experience of the participants. It does nothing to pull individual participants into a group discussion. And the question provides nothing to help establish the group to arrive at realistic solutions.


The powerful introductory question looks something like this. “Let’s move to problems with the procurement process. Think about the last time you had to purchase something. Consider the things that were real problems - the things that got you frustrated. Think about the things that made you say, ‘There has to be a better way to do this!’ What are some of those frustrating problems with the current procurement process?


The question pulls participants into their own experiences. It stirs memories of events that both helped solve problems and caused pain. It provides political cover by moving the discussion from a cultural complaint session to establishing tangible issues to be addressed based on actual events. And it helps eliminate a passive participant response from 'I don't know or ‘who cares’ to a proactive response of ‘this is what happened to me.’ By the nature of the introductory question, participants are providing better answers.


One pointer for providing powerful questions is to start with an imagination phrase such as ‘Consider…,’ ‘Remember…,’ or ‘Think About…’ to get participants ready to see the answers. Then ask the direct question that prompts them to respond.


One word of warning to starting with an imagination phrase is to avoid hypotheticals. Imagination phrases like "If you were queen (or king) for a day…" or "If you have all of the resources in the world…" stimulate responses that are not grounded in reality. Great facilitators remember to focus on the end game of a result that is created, understood, and accepted by all participants. Hypothetical or unrealistic responses often side-track discussions, fail to build practical consensus, and usually do more harm than good.



Clarifying Questions

The second class of powerful questions relates to participant responses. Many scenarios exist, and two are discussed here. The overarching takeaway is to use powerful clarifying questions to pull participants further into discussions that generate better answers and, in turn, produce better results.


The first example of a clarifying question is related to a participant comment that you (the facilitator) do not believe everyone understands what is said, but you (the facilitator) think you do. One form of clarifying question begins, “Let me explain to everyone what Bill is saying….” The facilitator will draw Bill into the conversation deeper by calling Bill by name. This opening also avoids a negative connotation concerning Bill’s clarity by placing the need for clarification on the facilitator. The clarifying question lets Bill confirm his meaning to the group by the facilitator saying, “Bill, it sounds like what you are saying is…. Is that right?”


A second example of a clarifying question is related to a participant comment that you (the facilitator) do not believe everyone understands what is said, and you are not sure anyone else does either. A simple response of “I don’t understand your comment” may get the clarification that the group needs but also raises the potential for conflict. One technique of asking a powerful clarifying question is to pull Jill further into the discussion by calling her name and asking an open-ended follow-up like "Jill, is that important because...?" or “Jill, tell us more about why this is important to you?”


What to Do

  1. Outline the probable content of an upcoming facilitation session

  2. Develop four or five preferred introductory questions (‘Consider…,’ ‘Remember…,’ ‘Think About…’)

  3. Expand on the list of clarifying questions from the two examples provided above

  4. Practice some mock exchanges with colleagues or friends

  5. Record the live session or have a co-facilitator provide feedback

  6. Self-appraise at each break on whether you asked powerful questions

  7. Continually improve with self-appraisal after each session and practice between facilitated sessions


Powerful Questions

Asking powerful questions makes a facilitated session more efficient, more effective, and more collaborative. Powerful questions produce better outcomes. No one wants to waste their time.


You will know great facilitators by the questions they ask. Resolve to be a great facilitator.


 

JD Solomon Inc provides facilitation at the nexus of facilities, infrastructure, and the environment. Contact us for more information about facilitation services ranging from Strategic Plans and Board Retreats to Criticality Analysis, Root Cause Analysis, and Capital Program Development.



Experts
bottom of page